Design of Experiments
Case Study 1
Data of runs conducted
1. Full Factorial Method
I input the values of the data into excel, and started off with analysis of individual factors and evaluated the average of each "HIGH" or "LOW" value of each factor.
After comparing the differences between the averages of the factors when "HIGH" or "LOW", the most significant factor was found to be C (Microwave power), followed by B (Microwave time) and then A (Diameter of bowl).
I proceeded to analyse the data further and determined the interaction of factors and their effects.
2. Fractional Factorial Method
I picked out runs #1, #2, #3 and #6 for analysis and put them into a table below.
Similar to my FULL factorial method, I started off with analysis of individual factors and evaluated the average of each "HIGH" or "LOW" value of each factor.
The results obtained were similar to that of the FULL factorial method, that the most significant factor found was found to be C (Microwave power), followed by B (Microwave time) and then A (Diameter of bowl).
However, I was not able to evaluate the interactions between factors as the FRACTIONAL factorial method provided me with insufficient data; the variations and combinations of factors were not enough to determine interaction effects.
CONCLUSION
Comments
Post a Comment